Title

The Happiness That Matters

About the Speaker

Daniel Haybron earned his B.A. in philosophy from Wesleyan University and his Ph.D. from Rutgers. Dr. Haybron works in ethics, moral psychology and political philosophy. Broadly speaking, he is interested in the connection between human nature and the good life. His research focuses mainly on the psychology of well-being and its connections with issues in ethical and political thought, as well as empirical research on well-being. Publications include Happiness: A Very Short Introduction (2008) and The Pursuit of Unhappiness: The Elusive Psychology of Well-Being (2008), as well as articles featured in a diverse array of academic journals, from Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Noûs to Utilitas and The Journal of Happiness Studies.

Streaming Media

 
Media is loading

Location

Fort Howard Theater, Bemis International Center, St. Norbert College

Start Date

11-7-2013 7:00 PM

Description

Dr. Haybron asks whether the “happiness” that happiness researchers study is an important kind of happiness? Should it be a major life goal or policy concern? Contemporary views of happiness tend to split into two camps: “judgment” theories, which define happiness as being satisfied with your life; and “feeling” theories, which define happiness as a positive emotional condition. Judgment theories tend to dominate the scientific research, because life satisfaction seems easy to measure. Yet life satisfaction views can’t explain the importance we place on happiness: you could be satisfied with your life when you think it’s going badly, and when you feel bad. Who needs that? “Emotional state” views, by contrast, make better sense of our interest in being happy. Dr. Haybron sketches a portrait of happiness, understood in these ways. He finds that happiness is a rich and complex psychological phenomenon that plays a central role in a good life and a good society. But neither is it the only thing that matters.

Share

COinS
 
Nov 7th, 7:00 PM

The Happiness That Matters

Fort Howard Theater, Bemis International Center, St. Norbert College

Dr. Haybron asks whether the “happiness” that happiness researchers study is an important kind of happiness? Should it be a major life goal or policy concern? Contemporary views of happiness tend to split into two camps: “judgment” theories, which define happiness as being satisfied with your life; and “feeling” theories, which define happiness as a positive emotional condition. Judgment theories tend to dominate the scientific research, because life satisfaction seems easy to measure. Yet life satisfaction views can’t explain the importance we place on happiness: you could be satisfied with your life when you think it’s going badly, and when you feel bad. Who needs that? “Emotional state” views, by contrast, make better sense of our interest in being happy. Dr. Haybron sketches a portrait of happiness, understood in these ways. He finds that happiness is a rich and complex psychological phenomenon that plays a central role in a good life and a good society. But neither is it the only thing that matters.